Apparently an attack +1 and an attack -1 token are supposed to cancel each other out:
https://boardgamegeek.com/article/18169810#18169810
I'm pretty sure this is missing from the rulebook, but they've been playing it this way at tournaments.
Apparently an attack +1 and an attack -1 token are supposed to cancel each other out:
https://boardgamegeek.com/article/18169810#18169810
I'm pretty sure this is missing from the rulebook, but they've been playing it this way at tournaments.
That's interesting. I didn't think that would be the case since Attack +1 tokens are optional and Attack-1 are mandatory
They do if you use an attack+1 token to negate an attack-1 token. Attack -1 tokens just have to be used on your next attack. Attack +1 tokens are your choice to use on an stack against a specific target
edit: I've looked at rulebook and see no mention of them automatically canceling each other out. While it is Luther listing that as a response, he is wrong that it is in the rulebook.
Yeah, it was supposed to be in the rulebook, but didn't make it. It was a last-minute rules change. If a character gets one and already has the other (as described), they both go away.
Is it supposed to balance something? I guess I just don't see why it would need to work that way.
Actually, I think it does two things:
I honestly don't know the official reasons - those are just my observations.
C.) Nerfs Bunker and, indirectly, Baron Blade; because God knows they needed it.
Is it the same for +1/-1 Defense tokens? I'd assume it is but the BGG discussion doesn't say, so I won't add that bit to the FAQ just yet.
Yeah it's the same.
Thanks, Luther! An thanks for Tactics! Every time I demo it I want to play it more. :D. Sorry about any stress concerning AZ!