I had posted the following in the pending questions section
>
This is really an initial question and one of two follow-up questions depending on the answer to the initial question.
Initial Question: When Dual Crowbars is used, does it result in (A) Simply applying damage to a second target or in (B) Initiating a second attack?
If (A - Simply apply damage to second target), then would that damage be reduced/increased by cards affecting the destination/target and/or possibly completely stopped by immunity?
If (B - Initiating a second attack), then would the initial amount of the attack be the same as Fixer's initial amount for the original attack or the same as Fixer's _RESULTING_ amount for the initial attack?
Examples ... which one of these five scenarios is correct?
A1 - Simply apply and destination effects/immunity in effect
Fixer has Bloody Knuckles in play and strikes the Deputy doing 3 points of damage. Using Dual Crowbars Fixer chooses The Chairman, but the Chairman has not yet flipped so is immune to damage and takes 0.
A2a - Simply apply and _NO_ destination effects/immunity in effect
Fixer has Bloody Knuckles in play and strikes the Deputy doing 3 points of damage. Using Dual Crowbars Fixer chooses The Chairman. The Chairman has not yet flipped, so is nominally immune to damage, but takes 3 points of damage anyway.
A2b - Simply apply and _NO_ destination effects in effect but immunity is still in effect
Fixer has Bloody Knuckles in play and strikes the Deputy doing 3 points of damage. Using Dual Crowbars Fixer chooses The Chairman. The Chairman _has_ flipped, so is not immune to damage, but destination effects are _NOT_ in effect, so the nemesis bonus is not used and The Chairman only takes 3 points of damage, not 4.
B1 - New attack, same amount as initial original attack.
Fixer has Bloody Knuckles in play and strikes the Deputy doing 3 points of damage. Using Dual Crowbars Fixer chooses The Chairman. The Chairman _has_ flipped, so is not immune to damage. Fixer does an attack of 1 point of damage which is increased by Bloody Knuckles and the Nemesis bonus to 4, so The Chairman takes 4 points of damage.
B2 - New attack, same amount as _RESULTING AMOUNT_ of original attack
Fixer has Bloody Knuckles in play and strikes the Deputy doing 3 points of damage. Using Dual Crowbars Fixer chooses The Chairman. The Chairman _has_ flipped, so is not immune to damage. Fixer does an attack of 3 points of damage which is increased by Bloody Knuckles and the Nemesis bonus to 6, so The Chairman takes 6 points of damage.
Summary: Is the damage to The Chairman 0, 3, 4, or 6. And, if it is 3, does The Chairman's immunity matter?
From the KantCon rulings (https://greaterthangames.com/forum/topic/answers-to-debated-questions-3871)
>
2. Is the second damage from Dual Crowbars modifiable?
Kind of. The damage isn't supposed to be increased however damage reduction would apply separately to each target. There will be look into future printings to clear that up.
This looks like scenario A1 to me. Is that right? Despite the answer including "damage isn't supposed to be increased", wouldn't affects like the nemesis bonus and anything that caused a target to take extra damage (like a bounty) still have an effect?